January 07, 2009

Be Glad You Are An Entrepreneur!

Life-preserver I just read a great post over on TheFunded by an anonymous writer titled, "Be Glad You Are An Entrepreneur In These Times!"  It's a public post and it's so true that I'll quote a little here.

He starts by writing:

Everywhere I look, I see talented skilled workers getting laid off with little to no chance of recovery in the near future. This has to be devastating.

What I find odd as an entrepreneur is the feeling that they are somehow now "in my boat", but they really are not. Having learned how to survive while building a business over the last 12 years, and getting by on less money than I would like, it is just not that alarming.

It's a good point.  The entrepreneur and the unemployed employee are now both treading water in the open ocean with no land in sight, but one has survival training and a rescue beacon, or as the anonymous poster on TheFunded wrote:

The difference between the two is the entrepreneur's knowledge of how to raise and make money, even if it is more difficult right now at least you still have options. For obvious reasons, this is a skill most employed people do not possess and are therefore at the complete mercy of others.

No one is guaranteed survival in these stormy economic times, but entrepreneurs should at least be confident in the survival skills they've learned and be sure to put them to good use.   

January 05, 2009

Top 10 Posts From 2008

As ranked by traffic to website during the year (as opposed to when it was written):

  1. The Science & Art Of Term Sheet Negotiation
  2. 5 Reasons Convertible Debt Sucks  
  3. Venture Debt For Startups  
  4. Due Diligence - What To Expect  
  5. How To Blog Like A Pro  
  6. How Liquidation Preferences Work  
  7. 2008 Startup Compensation Survey  
  8. 10 Tips On Negotiating With VCs  
  9. 10 Web 2.0 Tips: $75  
  10. Killver VC Pitch Deck
Not much to learn here.  That's actually about what I would have guessed had I not seen the Google Analytics numbers.  Although in 2008 I did learn that this is called a "sneeze page."   Who knew?

January 04, 2009

Layoffs In Venture Capital

I just got off the phone with a friend who is founder/CEO of an early stage medical device company.  His company is doing well and recently received a couple of term sheets for his first institutional round.  As he was going through the process of negotiating with the potential investors, he said they were trying to set his expectations low.  He told me a story about how one investor recounted tales of startups making mass layoffs, cutting back everywhere and generally dire conditions (basically sending the message that he should be happy to be getting an offer).

So my friend responded, "Wow, that sounds terrible.  This must be really affecting you badly...how many people have you had to layoff here?"

The VC stared at him with a bewildered look.

But it's not so far fetched though that layoffs will soon be coming to venture capital.  We're already starting to see layoffs at the large private equity funds where Blackstone, Carlyle and American Capital announced staff cuts between 7% and 19% in December.  A survey of 400 venture capitalists found that 60% predicted a drop greater than 10% in 2009 venture funding (below I've embedded the full presentation).  The take away here is expect to see cuts of at least 10% in 2009.  Those first to be cut will be the associates and principals at the larger funds, but expect to see some partners leaving as well.


What does this mean for entrepreneurs and is there anything you should be doing to prepare?

The worst situation is if you have a partner on your board and that person leaves the fund and is replaced by an associate or principal.  That means your board member (i.e. your advocate within the fund) will have a hard time supporting you (heck, they won't even be invited to the partner's meeting where funding decisions are made).  In this scenario you want to fight hard to get an "upgrade" to a partner and talk to your other board members about whether you can downgrade the offender to an observer (or kick them off the board all together) if you're stuck with a junior person.  Your other remaining VC board members will have aligned interests with you on this and may even see it as an opportunity to cramdown the offending investor.

The other more proactive thing you can do is to develop relationships with other partners at the fund (other than the one who sits on your board).  My own experience was that I would meet with partners other than my own usually just once per year which is what will happen if you're not proactive.  Having relationships with more than one partner will help you have a "plan B" in case your current partner leaves but it'll also help you in other ways (like being more of a known quantity when discussions about funding come up).  People are always kinder to someone they know than just names on paper.

January 03, 2009

There Is Absolutely No Bubble In Technology

Recorded December 6, 2007.  Don't say you weren't warned!



January 02, 2009

The Coming Venture Capital Boom

Peter Rip, Partner at Crosslink Capital has a pragmatic view of where we stand in the business cycle and the outlook for venture capital and entrepreneurship generally.  I quote his post on the topic below, but the full post is well worth a read.

As the fire continues to rage in financial markets, it is hard to imagine when Opportunity will reappear. But the truth is when everyone sees Opportunity; they are only seeing the reflection.  True Opportunity appears at the market bottom, not at the top.   It’s times like these that test what you believe in, and I believe in the Business Cycle, Human Creativity, and the stimulative effect of massive Government spending. 2009 and 2010 will be great times to invest to reap the benefits in 2012-2014, for those who can judge both business risk and liquidity risk, and have the courage of their convictions.

I think Peter is right.  It sucks right now and will for a while but at the end of the day this is just another (perhaps deeper and longer) dip in the cycle of business.  

January 01, 2009

The World Without Altgate

No, this blog is not going anywhere.  I was just looking at the 2008 Google Analytics data for Altgate.  It is an amazing tool.  I wish I had installed it when I first created this blog, but alas I didn't so I only have data starting in February of last year.  It's mildly disturbing that Google gets to keep all of that data, but I suppose it's a fair trade since the service is free.

Overall, 2008 was a great year of growth in traffic.  At the beginning of the year, there were just about 500 unique visitors per month and by December that grew to nearly 10K.  There was a similar growth in terms of RSS subscribers, finishing with about 750 (although Feedburner "lost" about 400 of them this morning which I assume will be "found" tomorrow).

One metric that jumped out at me is the global reach.  I was amazed to discover that of some 200-ish countries in the world, there has been at least one visit from each except for just 77.  Sure most of the traffic was from the US (about 73% of total unique visits) but there was also traffic from all kinds of places like India (2.3%), Germany (1.5%), Australia (1.4%), Slovenia (0.7%, who knew!) and Israel (0.6%).  Below is the complete map of the countries still without a visitor to Altgate...if you know someone there send them a referral!  I'll update you all when I get the list of those without Altgate down to a dozen or so.

Svalbard Spain United States of America Antarctica South Georgia Falkland Islands Bolivia Peru Ecuador Colombia Venezuela Guyana Suriname French Guiana Brazil Paraguay Uruguay Argentina Chile Greenland Canada United States of America United States of America Israel Jordan Cyprus Qatar United Arab Emirates Oman Yemen Saudia Arabia Iraq Afghanistan Turkmenistan Iran Syria Singapore China Mongolia Papua New Guinea Brunei Indonesia Malaysia Malaysia Tiawan Philippines Vietnam Cambodia Laos Thailand Burma Bangladesh Sri Lanka India Bhutan Nepal Pakistan Afghanistan Turkmenistan Tajikistan Kyrgyzstan Uzbekistan Japan North Korea South Korea Russia Kazakhstan Russia Montenegro Portugal Azerbaijan Armenia Georgia Ukraine Moldova Belarus Romania Bulgaria Macedonia Serbia Bosonia & Herzegovina Turkey Greece Albania Croatia Hungary Slovakia Slovenia Malta Spain Portugal Spain France Italy Italy Austria Switzerland Belgium France Ireland United Kingdom Norway Sweden Finland Estonia Latvia Lithuania Russia Poland Czech Republic Germany Denmark The Netherlands Iceland El Salvador Guatemala Panama Costa Rica Nicaragua Honduras Belize Mexico Trinidad & Tobago Puerto Rico Dominican Republic Haiti Jamaica The Bahamas Cuba Vanuatu Australia Solomon Islands Fiji New Caledonia New Zealand Eritrea Ethiopia Djibouti Somalia Kenya Uganda Tanzania Rwanda Burundi Madagascar Namibia Botswana South Africa Lesotho Swaziland Zimbabwe Mozambique Malawi Zambia Angola Democratic Repbulic of Congo Republic of Congo Gabon Equatorial Guinea Central African Republic Cameroon Nigeria Togo Ghana Burkina Fassu Cote d'Ivoire Liberia Sierra Leone Guinea Guinea Bissau The Gambia Senegal Mali Mauritania Niger Western Sahara Sudan Chad Egypt Libya Tunisia Morocco Algeria 
Afganistan Haiti Rwanda
Barbados Honduras Saint Kitts and Nevis
Benin  Iraq Saint Lucia
Bhutan Kazakhstan Samoa 
Bosnia & Herzegovina Kiribati  San Marino
Burkina Faso Korea, North Seychelles
Burundi  (Urundi) Kyrgyzstan            Sierra Leone
Cameroon Laos          Solomon Islands
Cape Verde Islands Lesotho  Somalia
Central African Republic Liberia Sudan
Chad Liechtenstein Suriname  
Comoros Maldives Swaziland
Côte d'Ivoire Mali Tajikistan
Dem. Rep. of Congo Marshall Islands The Gambia
Djibouti Mauritania Timor-Leste
Dominica Mongolia, Rep. Togo
El Salvador Montenegro Tonga (Nukualofa)
Equatorial Guinea  Mozambique Turkmenistan
Eritrea Myanmar (Burma) Tuvalu
Micronesia Namibia Uzbekistan
Fiji Nauru Vanuatu 
Gabon Niger Vatican City
Georgia Palau, Republic of Yemen
Guinea  Papua New Guinea Zambia 
Guinea–Bissau Paraguay Zimbabwe 
Guyana  Republic of Congo

Lastly, something that Google Analytics doesn't do is allow you to see where visitors are going when they leave your site.  You can see which page they left from but not where they went.  This feature is rumored to be in development but I couldn't get it even with the custom reporting.  Anyone have tips on this?

December 31, 2008

Microsoft Buys 37signals For $300 Million

Not really.

At least not yet.  But that's my prediction for 2009.  Outrageous, huh?  There are three elements of this prediction; let me address them in turn.

Why 37signals?

Simple, they make killer products, they are a cash machine, it's an attractive business model and they're visionaries.

I'm a huge fan of Basecamp.  For the few people who haven't heard of Basecamp, it's a team collaboration and project management tool.  Adoption amongst startups is high, but it has crossed the chasm and large companies are now adopting it with gusto.  I was in a meeting a couple weeks ago with some senior guys from a large (read billion dollar) offshoring/BPO company where they were pitching me for some business.  They spent 10 minutes of an hour-long meeting raving about Basecamp and how it made them "feel" like a small company.  They knew their competition for the deal was a group of smaller companies and part of their argument as to "why them" was Basecamp!  You know you have a killer product when people start ascribing emotions to it.

37signals has several other products, but Basecamp accounts for about 60% of their projected $8 million in 2008 revenue.  By the way, my friend Jed Christensen has a killer blog post on 37signal's financials where he walks you through how he reverse engineered their numbers.  If Jed's numbers are right, 37signals is a cash machine (with only 12 employees and annual costs of $2 million before taxes and $6 million of EBITDA).  A company that produces those kinds of numbers is certainly going to attract M&A attention even in a depressed market.

37signals also has a great business model.  They're considered the "gold standard" for the freemium model where you give away basic service and charge for enhanced features.  Their free trial and $24 per month basic service level make it very enticing to try out.  This is exactly what's killing Microsoft Project specifically and Microsoft's application business generally.  The low price also keeps them from getting the axe when budget cuts come.

Finally, the good folks at 37signals are true visionaries and not just on the technology or business front but in terms of building great organizations too.  I haven't met founder Jason Fried but reading interviews and stories about him, he's clearly the real deal.  And they didn't just create a great company they also spun off their technology into an open source framework (Ruby on Rails) and refined a new form of development termed "Getting Real."  Think about that for a minute.  Here's a company that is doing amazing things and they also had the time to create the dominant web 2.0 development framework and write a book.  Yes, they're a small team, but that too is a testament to their talent.

Why Microsoft?

Simple.  They need it.  Microsoft's application business is about to start a long, steady decline.  It reminds me of the newspaper business; it's just been made obsolete.  The concept of buying a piece of software, installing it on my desktop and then using it sporadically for the next several years without improvement is as over as reading news on a dead tree.  The writing is on the wall and it seems that Microsoft just hasn't gotten the memo. 

Remember Visio, the $559.95 software you use to draw complicated flow charts?  I always hated it that it cost so much and I only needed it a couple times per year.  Well, recently I've been playing around with the beta of Flowchart.com.  Check out this screen shot.  It's a killer webapp sure to severely eat away Visio's marketshare.

Flowchart (1)

Note that to resize and crop this picture I didn't use $699 Adobe Photoshop, instead I used SnipShot which is free.  Google and an army of other startups are methodically eating away at Microsoft's core applications business and there is just no stopping that.  The folks at Microsoft are smart and I'm sure they are looking at this but what a huge problem they face...cannibalizing your own business.  It has to be done and the only question is how and when.

In terms of how, it's clear that Microsoft's 90,000 employees aren't going to be the source.  If they were, it would have happened already.  So that only leaves the "buy" option and since Microsoft can't buy Google, 37signals is the next best choice.  In terms of when, 2009 is the right year because it will be at or near the bottom of this economic cycle.  The price will never be cheaper.  And Microsoft is still sitting on a cash hoard.

So why $300 million?

Because that's what it is going to take.  On the financials alone, 37signals should be worth about $80 million (10X revenue).  Not chickenfeed, but still not enough to get remaining founder Jason Fried to sell.  Jason is "famous" for saying he'd never hire someone who didn't use a Mac.  So basically getting Jason and his team on board is going to take throwing a lot of cash at the problem on the part of Microsoft.

But that still won't be enough.  Microsoft will also have to commit to porting Ruby to .NET and supporting RoR and Get Real throughout the firm.  Fried and his team will be given special evangelist roles and retaining them post transaction will be a key success factor.  I suspect Bill Gates will have to personally get involved in convincing Fried and company to go along.  A couple of years ago 37signals took an investment from Jeff Bezos, and not for the money or connections but for a relationship and advice so it shows that non-monetary motivation is at least as important as the money itself.

Of course this all probably won't happen, but it was fun to write.

Happy New Year!

December 28, 2008

How To Blog Like A Pro

Pro In the past year, I've harangued a number of friends relentlessly, telling them that they should start blogging.  And by my count, at least 4 have taken up the calling.  One example is my long time friend and attorney, Robert Chow, who just launched GrowthStage and has joined the open source law movement.

Blogging is a marathon.  To do it well you have to enjoy doing it the same way you enjoy a hobby.  If running a blog seems like "work" to you, that's a signal that it's not for you.  If you're seeking fame or fortune, there are far more effective ways than blogging.  Although, I confess that in 2008 I've gotten my 15 minutes of fame by getting on the front page of the BBJ, a mention by Wolf Blitzer on CNN, an article in Wired and a few blurbs in the Boston Globe, among others.  To blog like a pro, it takes a few hundred hours per year (although, in your first year, it could take 500-1,000 hours), so the bottom line is that you have to want to do it. 

Of course, these tips presuppose you have good to great writing skills and a content focus appropriate for the audience you're trying to reach.  As Paul Stamatiou pointed out in the comments below, content is king.

So what does it take other than time to blog like a pro?  Here are a few tips:

  1. Use your own domain.  Pick a witty name for your blog and buy the domain.  I've never seen a pro blog that uses the default domain @typepad.com, @blogspot.com or whatever.  In picking a name, don't paint yourself into a corner (for example, SeriesA.com is not as good as Altgate).  It's cheap (I use GoDaddy and it costs $15 for a year).  Also, when you buy the domain, buy it for at least 2 years, ideally 5.  Google likes domains that are registered for longer periods of time (for natural search results).  You'll have to upgrade your blogging account (more on that in tip #2) which costs something but it's worth it.  You should also set up an email address with your new domain, and use this as your contact on your blog.  You can easily have that domain email merge into your existing Gmail account so you can "reply as" from your blog email.

  2. Use WordPress.  You can find a lot written on why choose Blogger vs. TypePad vs. WordPress, etc., but the short answer to this is that pros use WordPress.  WordPress is open source so they tend to play nice with other companies, particularly the widget makers.  For example, third party comment provider Disqus isn't supported (easily) by Typepad.  You don't want to host your own blog either...you'll just end up going down at exactly the time you get a lot of traffic (although if your site becomes hugely popular you'll have to consider hosting).  Some of you will notice that I'm not following my own advice here (I use Typepad for this blog).  Unfortunately, when I launched Altgate I didn't have these tips and it turns out that switching from Typepad to WordPress is complicated.
     
  3. Create a custom theme.  There are millions of blogs out there and they all look pretty much the same.  Pro bloggers have a custom theme that is clean, simple and recognizable.  A couple of good examples are Startup Company Lawyer, Instigator Blog, Blog Maverick and Marc Andreessen.  Unfortunately this is another case where I'm not following my own advice.  If there are any designers out there who are reading my blog, ping me and we'll figure out how to fix that.
     
  4. Use Google Analytics.  Make sure you install Google Analytics on your blog.  You'll have to register for an account but it's free.  The analytics you get are amazing.  You'll be able to see a lot about your visitors. It will help you find out where your traffic is coming from and where they are going.  Over time, understanding your "demo" will help you write better for them.
     
  5. Use Google Webmaster ToolsWebmaster Tools is a service that allows you to improve the visibility of your site to Google and other search engines.  For example, there are diagnostics to see if there are any errors in crawling your site.  You can see statistics like what search terms people are using to get to your site.  You can see which pages are linked to and from where.
     
  6. Create sitemaps.  Sitemaps are a "poor man's semantic web."  Basically it creates a map of your blog that computers can understand.  I used this free service called XML-Sitemaps to create site maps for Google, Yahoo and MSN (naturally the standards vary) and overnight I saw a jump in natural search traffic. 

  7. Use Feedburner.  There are two types of readers of your blog.  One will view your site in their web browser and the other in an RSS reader (like Google Reader).  Yes, I'm ignoring email and mobile users for the moment.  Anyway, Google Analytics will give you information on those who visit your site, but you'll want to use Feedburner to give you information on who's accessing your blog via RSS.  You should also promote your RSS subscription button very prominently above the fold on your blog.  RSS readers are your most loyal audience (as they will see every post).  You should also include the option (Feedburner has it) to subscribe via email.

  8. Use social commenting.  Install a social commenting widget like Disqus or Intense Debate.  This makes commenting on your site much easier and you'll also get more comments (eventually).  I say eventually, because in the early days (as in your first year or so) you unlikely to get many comments at all.  I use Disqus and have had a significant increase in comments since installing it.

  9. Create site navigation.  Make sure you tag blog posts with a category and then have those categories visible at the top of your blog.  I use them on Altgate.  I didn't start with this and had to retro it so it looks like crap.  This will help your readers, but also will help with natural search (e.g. you eventually will get Google site links).  At least that's my hope...this whole site links thing is quite elusive.
     
  10. Add a favicon.  A favicon is that little 16x16 pixel icon that shows up in browsers tabs, URL forms and bookmark lists.  To do one of these is easy and it makes your blog look professional.  If your blog sports the Typepad bubble or the Blogger "e" it's the sure sign of a nubie.  If you have a custom theme, this will come with it.  If you're like me and you haven't done the custom theme, you first need to create a square picture.  Ideally something that will be viewable at a small size.  I just did an "a" for Altgate (as a joke, I used the Web 2.0 Logo Creator).  You can get examples from other sites too.  Then you need to generate a favicon.ico file.  Just Google "favicon.ico generator" and there are many websites that easily convert square JPEGs or PNG files to .ico files.  Once you have the file, just follow the instructions from WordPress, Blogger or whatever platform you're using to upload the file and voila!
     
  11. Learn web basics.  Whatever blog application you decide to use, you will still be limited in what you can do if you don't know web basics.  It's not complicated and you don't have to learn the fancy stuff if you're not interested, but you do need to have basic HTML skills, an understanding of CSS, JavaScript, XML, etc.
     
  12. Provide site search. I recently installed Lijit and am loving it.  Lijit (pronounced like "legit") allows viewers of your blog to search the content on your blog (and that of anyone in your network as you define, which in my case is my blogroll).  It also has a cool feature called re-search which provides other search results to users who arrived from a search engine.  For example, if you searched for "venture debt" on Google and then clicked on the link to Altgate, Ligit would show 10 more relevant posts from my blog and my network.
     
  13. Write with a voice.  If your blog reads like a Reuters news feed, it's less likely to attract an audience.  Pros write with a voice.  For example, Al Gore has a blog, but until last month (when it got some press coverage) there really was no audience.  Billionaire Mark Cuban, on the other hand, has (until last month) had 10X the audience.  I think the difference is voice.
     
  14. Post regularly.  The key with blogging is to realize it's a marathon and not a sprint.  I did my first post in 2005 and my second post in 2007.  Not a lot going on during those two years, but then I started posting regularly.  Over the past year I've averaged 2.1 posts per week (according to Google).  You should target 1 post per week.  That's actually pretty hard to do.  I was able to get started on that pace during my EIR gig at Softbank.  Since it's best to have your posts evenly spaced out, you should create posts and save them as drafts or schedule them for publishing in the future.
     
  15. Be social.  Add a blogroll to your blog.  People will eventually return the favor.  Comment on other people's blogs.  Give your blog URL and blog email in the comment form when commenting on other blogs.  You'll start a dialog and other bloggers will often continue it at your site. 

So that's it.  Like most things, there's no magic; just a little direction and a lot of time and hard work.  Follow these simple tips and you're certain to soon be blogging like a pro.

December 23, 2008

Washington Out Of Control

Hedge_fundjpg I told myself I wasn't going to post anymore on the financial crisis and then I saw this article in the FT about how on Friday (12/19) the Federal Reserve announced a new program of lending capital to any US company investing in securitized consumer loans.  It's a $200 billion program.  This just burns me up.

Translation: the US government just bailed out the hedge fund industry to the tune of $200 billion!  Were there any strings attached to the money like reducing the 1-and-20 hedge fund GP compensation agreements?  Nope!  Any other concessions?  Nope!  So all these hedge funds are going to get bailed out right before year-end which will allow them to book profits (or less losses) and the managers get paid more.  Thank you Uncle Sam!

Makes that $15 billion auto bailout seem cheap (and with favorable concessions) in comparison.  I think it's time the government stopped picking winners and losers because it's clear it's being done based on lobbying dollars spent and not for any rational reasons.

Either let companies fail or publish a set of rules for which companies get government support and why. 

December 22, 2008

A View On Investing

Fred Wilson over at AVC recounts an experience from being on a panel of VCs over in Europe a few weeks ago.  The basic gist is that the state of the public markets has little if any effect on entrepreneurial value creation.  An interesting nugget from Fred's post:

Eric Archambeau of Wellington Partners was on the panel and he described some research work he and some associates did a while back. They went back to the 1970s and charted for each year through the late 1990s the number of venture backed companies started that year and the number of $1bn revenue companies and $500mm to $1bn revenue companies that emerged in each 'vintage year'. The result of that work, he explained, was that the number in each category was relatively constant year after year with no discernable pattern and certainly not correlated with or against market or economic cycles. Interestingly, the data was not correlated with innovation and technology cycles either

However, the implied assumption is that the 'model' is linear and we're in such uncharted water that I'm not sure that's true.  You know how when you're benchmarking public equities the data sets always leave out performance from the 1929 crash and most of the following decade?  It's more likely than not we're in a similarly non-linear time...

Lijit Search

Get Altgate by Email

About Altgate Authors





Recent Comments

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter



    © 2005-2009 Furqan Nazeeri. Some Rights Reserved.
    Feedback Form